Zendoric

AI model comparison — text, image and video

The leading AI models from the US, Europe and China — text, image and video generation — compared by quality (market benchmarks), cost and open-source status, always separating remote (API) and local (on your hardware) models.

Data as of 2026-07-25 · automated research (Artificial Analysis, LMArena, official pricing) — verify before deciding.

📊 How quality is measured — three indices

We show quality three complementary ways. Here is how each index is built before you read the charts:

① Zendoric Quality (0-100) = equal-thirds average of SWE-bench-Pro (33% · real software development, checked against the maker) + LMArena (33% · human preference, normalised Elo) + Terminal-Bench (33% · agentic terminal capability). If a model lacks one of the three, its weight is shared among those present (at least two required).

② AA Index (Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 0-100) = a broader composite index (reasoning, science, code, maths). It gives a second reading: depending on how you measure, the maker ranking changes.

③ Cybersecurity (0-100) = capability on expert cyber tasks (hard «unguided pass@1» protocol: vuln-research and realistic exploitation). We use a non-saturated metric (the top is around 71, not 100, leaving headroom), not the Cybench «pass@k» the frontier already saturates. Sources: UK AISI, NIST-CAISI, CVE-Bench. We frame it as capability and risk, not an offensive ranking; where there is no direct eval it is estimated «est.».

📈 Zendoric Quality over time (frontier makers)

Quality index (0-100) of the top makers (their best model), last 24 months. Dashed line = quality estimated from the AA Index (labs without SWE-bench-Pro). Updated daily.

Moonshot AIAnthropicOpenAIxAIZhipu AIGoogleAlibabaDeepSeekMicrosoftMistral AIMeta
26405468829624-0824-1125-0225-0525-0825-1126-0226-0526-07Kimi k1.5Kimi K2Kimi K2.6Kimi K3Sonnet 3.5 v2Sonnet 3.7Opus 4Opus 4.7Opus 4.8Fable 5Opus 5Claude Fable 5o1o3GPT-5GPT-5.5GPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.6 Terra (est.)Grok 4Grok 4.3Grok 4.5GLM-4-PlusGLM-4.5GLM-5GLM-5.2GLM-5.2Gemini 2.0Gemini 2.5Gemini 3 ProGemini 3.6 Flash (est.)Qwen2.5Qwen3Qwen3.5Qwen3.7-MaxQwen3.7-MaxV3R1V3.2V4-ProDeepSeek V4-ProMAI-1MAI-1-previewLarge 3Mistral Large 3 (est.)Llama 4Llama 4 Maverick (est.)

📈 AA Index over time (frontier makers)

AA Index (Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 0-100) of the top makers (their best model), last 24 months. It is a broader composite index (reasoning, science, code, maths) than ours. The historical series is reconstructed by anchoring each maker's trajectory to its current AA. Updated daily.

AnthropicMoonshot AIOpenAIxAIZhipu AIGoogleAlibabaDeepSeekMicrosoftMistral AIMeta
8193143546624-0824-1125-0225-0525-0825-1126-0226-0526-07Sonnet 3.5 v2Sonnet 3.7Opus 4Opus 4.7Opus 4.8Fable 5Opus 5Claude Opus 5Kimi k1.5Kimi K2Kimi K2.6Kimi K3o1o3GPT-5GPT-5.5GPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.6 SolGrok 4Grok 4.3Grok 4.5GLM-4-PlusGLM-4.5GLM-5GLM-5.2GLM-5.2Gemini 2.0Gemini 2.5Gemini 3 ProGemini 3.6 FlashQwen2.5Qwen3Qwen3.5Qwen3.7-MaxQwen3.7-MaxV3R1V3.2V4-ProDeepSeek V4-ProMAI-1MAI-1-previewLarge 3Mistral Large 3Llama 4Llama 4 Maverick

🛡️ Cybersecurity over time (frontier makers)

Cybersecurity index (0-100) of each maker's best model, last 24 months. Metric: EXPERT cyber tasks under a hard «unguided pass@1» protocol (no hints, one attempt; vuln-research and realistic exploitation). We pick it because it is NOT saturated — the top is around 71, not 100, so it discriminates and shows headroom (we drop Cybench «pass@k», where the frontier already scores ~100%). Sources: UK AISI (GPT-5.5 71.4% vs Anthropic preview 68.6%), NIST-CAISI, CVE-Bench. High confidence only for OpenAI/Anthropic (measured by AISI); the rest imputed by proximity → the whole series is marked «est.». We frame it as capability and RISK to govern, not an offensive ranking. Updated daily.

OpenAIAnthropicZhipu AIGoogleMoonshot AIMicrosoftAlibabaxAIDeepSeekMistral AIMeta
18304253647624-0824-1125-0225-0525-0825-1126-0226-0526-07o1o3GPT-5GPT-5.5GPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.6 Sol (est.)Sonnet 3.5 v2Sonnet 3.7Opus 4Opus 4.7Opus 4.8Fable 5Opus 5Claude Mythos 5 (est.)GLM-4-PlusGLM-4.5GLM-5GLM-5.2GLM-5.2 (est.)Gemini 2.0Gemini 2.5Gemini 3 ProGemini 3 Pro (est.)Kimi k1.5Kimi K2Kimi K2.6Kimi K2.6 (est.)MAI-1MAI-1 (est.)Qwen2.5Qwen3Qwen3.5Qwen3.7-MaxQwen3.7-Max (est.)Grok 4Grok 4.3Grok 4.3 (est.)V3R1V3.2V4-ProDeepSeek V4-Pro (est.)Large 3Mistral Large 3 (est.)Llama 4Llama 4 (est.)

💰 Zendoric Quality vs cost

Flagship models of the top makers by quality (a maker may have several, e.g. Anthropic: Opus 5, Opus 4.8 and Fable 5). HIGHER = more quality; LEFT = cheaper (log axis). Hollow dot = quality estimated (AA Index). Colour by maker.

OpenAIAnthropicGooglexAIDeepSeekAlibabaMoonshot AIZhipu AIMistral AIMeta
Sweet spot364860728496$0.5$1$2$5$10$20$50Output cost ($/1M tokens · log scale)Claude Fable 5Claude Mythos 5GPT-5.6 SolClaude Opus 4.8GPT-5.5Kimi K3GPT-5.6 Terra (est.)Grok 4.5GLM-5.2Gemini 3.6 Flash (est.)Claude Sonnet 5Grok 4Qwen3.7-MaxKimi K2.6DeepSeek V4-ProGemini 3 ProClaude Sonnet 4.6Mistral Large 3 (est.)Llama 4 Maverick (est.)

💰 AA Index vs cost

Same format as the quality/cost chart, but the vertical axis is the AA Index. HIGHER = more capability; LEFT = cheaper (log axis). Hollow dot = estimated AA (Terminal-Bench/SWE-Pro). Colour by maker.

OpenAIAnthropicGoogleMetaxAIMistral AIDeepSeekAlibabaMoonshot AIZhipu AI
Sweet spot61830425466$0.5$1$2$5$10$20$50Output cost ($/1M tokens · log scale)AA IndexClaude Opus 5Claude Fable 5Claude Mythos 5GPT-5.6 SolClaude Opus 4.8GPT-5.5Kimi K3GPT-5.6 TerraGrok 4.5Claude Sonnet 5GLM-5.2GPT-5.6 LunaGemini 3.6 FlashClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.7-MaxDeepSeek V4-ProKimi K2.6Gemini 3 ProGrok 4Mistral Large 3Llama 4 MaverickMagistral Small

🏁 Efficient frontier — quality vs cost

Every cloud model with data. Y = AA Index; X = output cost, log and REVERSED: further RIGHT is cheaper — the top-right corner is ideal. The green line joins the efficient frontier: models with no alternative that is both better and cheaper; picking off the line is only justified by non-price factors (ecosystem, context, open source). Hollow dot = estimated AA. Hover a dot for details.

Efficient frontier (no model is both better and cheaper)Other models
61830425466$0.5$1$2$5$10$20$50Output cost ($/1M tokens · log scale · right = cheaper)most efficient ↗Claude Opus 5 — AA 61 · $25/1M tokensClaude Fable 5 — AA 60 · $50/1M tokensClaude Mythos 5 — AA 60 · $50/1M tokensKimi K3 — AA 57 · $15/1M tokensGPT-5.6 Sol — AA 56 · $30/1M tokensClaude Opus 4.8 — AA 56 · $25/1M tokensGPT-5.5 — AA 55 · $30/1M tokensGPT-5.6 Terra — AA 55 · $15/1M tokensGrok 4.5 — AA 54 · $6/1M tokensClaude Sonnet 5 — AA 53 · $15/1M tokensGLM-5.2 — AA 51 · $2.2/1M tokensGPT-5.6 Luna — AA 51 · $6/1M tokensGemini 3.6 Flash — AA 50 · $7.5/1M tokensClaude Sonnet 4.6 — AA 47 · $15/1M tokensQwen3.7-Max — AA 46 · $6/1M tokensDeepSeek V4-Pro — AA 44 · $0.87/1M tokensKimi K2.6 — AA 43 · $2.5/1M tokensGemini 3 Pro — AA 40 · $10/1M tokensGrok 4 — AA 33 · $15/1M tokensMistral Large 3 — AA 16 · $6/1M tokensLlama 4 Maverick — AA 14 · $0.6/1M tokensMagistral Small — AA 11 · $1.5/1M tokensDeepSeek V4-ProLlama 4 MaverickMagistral SmallClaude Opus 5Claude Fable 5Claude Mythos 5Kimi K3GPT-5.6 SolClaude Opus 4.8GPT-5.5GPT-5.6 TerraGrok 4.5Claude Sonnet 5GLM-5.2GPT-5.6 LunaGemini 3.6 FlashClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.7-MaxKimi K2.6Gemini 3 ProGrok 4Mistral Large 3

🏆 Zendoric Quality (SW dev + arena + agentic)

ModelZendoric QualitySWE-bench-ProDeepSWELMArenaTerminal-BenchLiveCodeBenchGPQAARC-AGI-2
🇨🇳 Kimi K3Moonshot AI · China90.767.5148688.368.093.5
🇺🇸 Claude Fable 5Anthropic · USA90.180.369.7151591.792.6
🇺🇸 Claude Mythos 5Anthropic · USA88.180.0150784.391.794.1
🇺🇸 GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI · USA78.963.072.7147088.887
🇺🇸 Grok 4.5xAI · USA77.364.753146883.393.1
🇨🇳 GLM-5.2Zhipu AI · China76.962.146.2147581.080.2787
🇺🇸 Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic · USA76.569.259.0145582.788.88414
🇺🇸 GPT-5.5OpenAI · USA76.358.667.0147582.78516
🇺🇸 Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic · USA74.763.253.8146180.48312
🇺🇸 Grok 4xAI · USA74.2143083.379.48416
🇨🇳 Qwen3.7-MaxAlibaba · China72.660.6147569.791.6817
🇨🇳 Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI · China68.458.6146066.789.6789
🇨🇳 DeepSeek V4-ProDeepSeek · China66.155.4145067.993.5829
🇺🇸 Gemini 3 ProGoogle · USA65.843.3150154.291.78415
🇺🇸 Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic · USA63.458.129.9143067.0809
🇺🇸 MAI-1-previewMicrosoft · USA49.452.846.087.784.2
🇺🇸 Claude Opus 5Anthropic · USA79.2
🇺🇸 Llama 4 MaverickMeta · USA128843.4705
🇪🇺 Mistral Large 3Mistral AI · Europa141574726
🇪🇺 Magistral SmallMistral AI · Europa70.8870.074
🆕 🇺🇸 GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI · USA87.4
🆕 🇺🇸 GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI · USA84.7
🆕 🇺🇸 Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle · USA491485
🆕 🇨🇳 Qwen3.8-Max-PreviewAlibaba (Qwen) · China

Quality = equal-thirds average of SWE-bench-Pro (SW development) + LMArena (human preference) + Terminal-Bench (agentic capability), the three with reliable sources (Zendoric Quality); if one is missing its weight is shared among those present (at least two; otherwise «—»). LiveCodeBench and GPQA are shown for reference (indicative, may be incomplete) but are NOT in the index; ARC-AGI-2 (arcprize.org) tracks AGI progress: models score VERY low → still far from AGI. %, except LMArena (Elo).

💵 Economics (USD / 1M tokens)

ModelInputCacheOutput
🇨🇳 Kimi K3Moonshot AI · China$3.0$0.3$15.0
🇺🇸 Claude Fable 5Anthropic · USA$10.0$1.0$50.0
🇺🇸 Claude Mythos 5Anthropic · USA$10.0$1.0$50.0
🇺🇸 GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI · USA$5.0$0.5$30.0
🇺🇸 Grok 4.5xAI · USA$2.0$0.3$6.0
🇨🇳 GLM-5.2Zhipu AI · China$0.6$0.26$2.2
🇺🇸 Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic · USA$5.0$0.5$25.0
🇺🇸 GPT-5.5OpenAI · USA$5.0$0.5$30.0
🇺🇸 Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic · USAuntil Aug 31, 2026 $2.0
from Sep 1, 2026 $3.0
until Aug 31, 2026 $0.2
from Sep 1, 2026 $0.3
until Aug 31, 2026 $10.0
from Sep 1, 2026 $15.0
🇺🇸 Grok 4xAI · USA$3.0$0.75$15.0
🇨🇳 Qwen3.7-MaxAlibaba · China$1.2$0.25$6.0
🇨🇳 Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI · China$0.6$0.16$2.5
🇨🇳 DeepSeek V4-ProDeepSeek · China$0.28$0.03$0.87
🇺🇸 Gemini 3 ProGoogle · USA$1.25$0.31$10.0
🇺🇸 Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic · USA$3.0$0.3$15.0
🇺🇸 MAI-1-previewMicrosoft · USA
🇺🇸 Claude Opus 5Anthropic · USA$5.0$0.5$25.0
🇺🇸 Llama 4 MaverickMeta · USA$0.2$0.6
🇪🇺 Mistral Large 3Mistral AI · Europa$2.0$0.2$6.0
🇪🇺 Magistral SmallMistral AI · Europa$0.5$0.05$1.5
🆕 🇺🇸 GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI · USA$2.5$0.25$15.0
🆕 🇺🇸 GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI · USA$1.0$0.1$6.0
🆕 🇺🇸 Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle · USA$1.5$0.15$7.5
🆕 🇨🇳 Qwen3.8-Max-PreviewAlibaba (Qwen) · China

Claude Sonnet 5: scheduled price increase (same model) — reduced pricing until Aug 31, 2026 and standard pricing from Sep 1, 2026.

🔓 Open source & type

ModelOpen sourceLicenseType
🇨🇳 Kimi K3Moonshot AI · ChinaNoProprietaryProprietary (API only)
🇺🇸 Claude Fable 5Anthropic · USANoProprietaryProprietary (API only)
🇺🇸 Claude Mythos 5Anthropic · USANoProprietaryProprietary (API only)
🇺🇸 GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI · USANoProprietaryProprietary (API only)
🇺🇸 Grok 4.5xAI · USANoProprietaryProprietary (API only)
🇨🇳 GLM-5.2Zhipu AI · ChinaYesMITOpen-weight
🇺🇸 Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic · USANoProprietaryProprietary (API only)
🇺🇸 GPT-5.5OpenAI · USANoProprietaryProprietary (API only)
🇺🇸 Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic · USANoProprietaryProprietary (API only)
🇺🇸 Grok 4xAI · USANoProprietaryProprietary (API only)
🇨🇳 Qwen3.7-MaxAlibaba · ChinaNoProprietaryProprietary (API only)
🇨🇳 Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI · ChinaYesModified MITOpen-weight
🇨🇳 DeepSeek V4-ProDeepSeek · ChinaYesMITOpen-weight
🇺🇸 Gemini 3 ProGoogle · USANoProprietaryProprietary (API only)
🇺🇸 Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic · USANoProprietaryProprietary (API only)
🇺🇸 MAI-1-previewMicrosoft · USANoProprietaryProprietary (API only)
🇺🇸 Claude Opus 5Anthropic · USANoProprietaryProprietary (API only)
🇺🇸 Llama 4 MaverickMeta · USAYesLlama 4 CommunityOpen-weight
🇪🇺 Mistral Large 3Mistral AI · EuropaYesApache-2.0Open-weight
🇪🇺 Magistral SmallMistral AI · EuropaYesApache-2.0Open-weight
🆕 🇺🇸 GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI · USANoProprietaryProprietary (API only)
🆕 🇺🇸 GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI · USANoProprietaryProprietary (API only)
🆕 🇺🇸 Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle · USANoProprietaryProprietary (API only)
🆕 🇨🇳 Qwen3.8-Max-PreviewAlibaba (Qwen) · ChinaNoProprietaryProprietary (API only)

🖥️ Open source you can self-host

Small/medium models you can run on your own machine (laptop/PC/Mac). Quality = Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (0-100; output quality), the measure with best coverage of small open models (LMArena does not list sub-32B). Memory estimated at 4-bit (Q4) and 8-bit (Q8) quantization; on Apple Silicon it is UNIFIED memory (RAM=VRAM).

ModelQuality (AA Index)GPQAParamsRAM Q4RAM Q8GPUCPU / MacLicense
Qwen3.5-27BAlibaba4285.527B16 GB31 GB≥16 GBLimitado (mejor GPU/Mac ≥32 GB)Apache-2.0
Gemma 4 31BGoogle398631B18 GB35 GB≥24 GBLimitado (mejor GPU/Mac ≥32 GB)Gemma
Qwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba3784.235B21 GB40 GB≥24 GBLimitado (mejor GPU/Mac ≥32 GB)Apache-2.0
Gemma 4 26B A4BGoogle3182.326B15 GB29 GB≥16 GBLimitado (mejor GPU/Mac ≥32 GB)Gemma
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3BNVIDIA2876.130B19 GB36 GB≥24 GBLimitado (mejor GPU/Mac ≥32 GB)NVIDIA Open Model
gpt-oss-20bOpenAI2471.520B13 GB25 GB≥16 GBLimitado (mejor GPU/Mac ≥32 GB)Apache-2.0
Gemma 4 12BGoogle2278.812B8 GB15 GB≥8 GBSí (CPU lento · Mac 16 GB)Gemma
Gemma 4 E4BGoogle1958.64B4 GB6 GB≥8 GBSí (CPU/Mac, fluido)Gemma
Gemma 4 E2BGoogle1543.42B3 GB4 GB≥8 GBSí (CPU/Mac, fluido)Gemma

🗄️ Large open source (server / multi-GPU)

Powerful open models that need a server or multiple GPUs. Quality = LMArena Elo (human preference over output, source lmarena.ai), which does cover large models. For MoE, memory counts total parameters (all experts are loaded). Memory estimated at 4-bit (Q4) and 8-bit (Q8) quantization; on Apple Silicon it is UNIFIED memory (RAM=VRAM).

ModelQuality (LMArena)GPQAParamsRAM Q4RAM Q8GPUCPU / MacLicense
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek146590.11600B882 GB1762 GB12× 80 GB (servidor)No (servidor GPU)MIT
GLM-5.2Zhipu AI146591.2744B411 GB820 GB6× 80 GB (servidor)No (servidor GPU)MIT
Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI146090.51100B552 GB1102 GB7× 80 GB (servidor)No (servidor GPU)Modified MIT
Qwen3.5-397B-A17BAlibaba145088.4397B220 GB438 GB3× 80 GB (servidor)No (servidor GPU)Apache-2.0
Llama 4 MaverickMeta142069.8400B223 GB444 GB3× 80 GB (servidor)No (servidor GPU)Llama 4 Community
Mistral Large 3Mistral AI141668.0675B373 GB744 GB5× 80 GB (servidor)No (servidor GPU)Apache-2.0
gpt-oss-120bOpenAI135280.1117B66 GB130 GB≥80 GBNo (servidor GPU)Apache-2.0

🎨 Image generation

The leading IMAGE generation models, split between remote services (pay per image via API) and open models you can run on your own hardware.

☁️ Remote (API / cloud)

ModelQuality (arena)Price (per image)Notes
GPT Image 2OpenAI · USA1338 AA Arena nº1 confirmado; 2º Reve 2.1 1300 (era 1305), gap ~38; arena.ai +242 (1512) confirmado$0,211/img high (=$211/1K API OpenAI); fal.ai $0,005 low a $0,401 high 4K (fal.ai no verif. al detalle)Nº1 t2i confirmado. Lanzado abr-2026. 2K, texto multilingüe y prompt adherence líder
MAI-Image-2.5Microsoft · USA1269 AA (era 1265), nº3 t2i confirmado; 2º Reve 2.1 1300Azure Foundry $47/M img out confirmado; ~$0,048/img estimadoMicrosoft. Nº3 t2i (tras Reve 2.1); Flash más barata (~1207 Elo)
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)Google · USA1222 AA t2i (era 1218), nº9 de 81 (CORREGIDO, era nº13); fuera del top-3$0,134/img 1-2K · $0,24/img 4K Gemini API (Batch 50% → 4K ~$0,12) confirmado= Gemini 3 Pro Image. Salida hasta 4096×4096
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite)Google · USA1262 AA t2i (era 1251), nº4 (CORREGIDO, era nº5)$0,034/img (1K) Gemini API confirmado (Batch $0,017)= Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image. Rápida/barata ~4s, solo 1K
GPT Image 1.5OpenAI · USA1260 AA (era 1256), nº6 t2i confirmado$0,009 low · $0,034 medio · $0,133 high (1024 OpenAI API) — tiers no verif. al detalleGeneración anterior OpenAI, aún competitiva (nº6 AA)
Grok ImaginexAI · USA1203 AA (image-quality) nº12 (era 1201/nº14); variante base 1178 nº14$0,02/img confirmado (1K/2K, hasta 3 refs)xAI. Precio bajo confirmado. i2v nº1 AA (1336)
Cosmos 3 SuperNVIDIA · USA1217 AA t2i (era 1214); Nº1 open weights confirmado en AAOpen weights (licencia OpenMDW-1.1, self-host gratis); API $0,04/img en fal y WaveSpeedNVIDIA, omnimodal MoT ~64B (Qwen3-VL 32B). Nº1 open AA t2i confirmado

💻 Local (open-weight, on your hardware)

ModelLicenseHardwareNotes
FLUX.2Black Forest Labsopen-weight + APIGPU dedicada (variantes dev/FP8)Lanz. 25-nov-2025 (max 16-dic, klein 15-ene-2026), hasta 4MP; open + Pro/Flex/Max API
Qwen-Image 2.0AlibabaApache-2.07B — GPU 16GB+Lanzado 10-feb-2026, 7B + enc. 8B Qwen3-VL, 2K nativo, tipografía EN/ZH
Z-Image TurboAlibaba (Tongyi)open-weight~1 s/imagen en H100; corre en Mac (MLX)Alibaba Tongyi-MAI, 6B, sub-segundo en H100. El open más rápido
Stable Diffusion 3.5Stability AIStability CommunityGPU 8-16GBUpgrade gratis desde SD 3.0. Mayor ecosistema (Civitai, ComfyUI, LoRAs)
HiDream-O1-Image-1.5HiDreamopen-weightGPU dedicadav1.5 CERRADO (hosted), hasta 2K. Top-4 AA confirmado

Data as of 2026-07-29 · sources: Artificial Analysis Image/Video Arena · arena.ai · llm-stats.com · Pixazo · documentación de fabricantes · arena Elo is blind human preference over the output; indicative prices — verify before deciding.

🎬 Video generation

The leading VIDEO generation models, split between remote services (pay per generated second via API) and open models for your own hardware.

☁️ Remote (API / cloud)

ModelQuality (arena)Price (per second)Notes
Kling 3.0 / TurboKuaishou · ChinaCon audio 1112 (Pro 1080p, ~#6 t2v). Gemini Omni lidera, no Kling. Sin audio 1244 NO VERIF; arena.ai 1991 NO VERIFCORREGIDO: fal Kling 3.0 Turbo 1080p ~$0,14/s (no $0,08); ~$2,10 por 15sKuaishou feb-2026; Turbo/Omni 17-jun-2026. Hasta 15s + audio nativo
Veo 3.1Google · USACORREGIDO: NO top-3. Con audio 1096, ~#6-9 t2v. Lidera Gemini Omni Flash en AALite ~$0,05/s · Fast $0,10/s (720p) · Std $0,40/s con audio (720p/1080p) — Vertex/Gemini APITres niveles + audio nativo (Vertex AI). Std $0,40/s audio incluido
Gemini Omni FlashGoogle · USA1244 con audio #1 t2v · 1325 sin audio #1 (orig 1326). Lidera t2v e i2v (i2v 1199 c/audio, 1375 s/audio)~$0,10/s (720p,24fps) preview Gemini API/AI Studio. Precio exacto NO VERIFICADOGoogle, I/O may-2026. Multimodal, audio nativo, edición conversacional, 3-10s
Seedance 2.0 (Dreamina)ByteDance · China720p 1228 con audio #2 (orig 1227) · 1272 sin audio #4. Fast 1703 arena.ai NO VERIF~$0,10/s std (AA ~$9/min 1080p). EvoLink desde $0,045/s. Fast ~$0,081/s NO VERIFByteDance SEED 12-feb-2026. Multimodal, 15s + audio estéreo
Sora 2OpenAI · USA— (ausente del leaderboard AA)$0,10–0,70/s aún activo hasta cierre (orig '—')EN RETIRADA: app cerrada 26-abr-2026; API se apaga 24-sep-2026 (410 después). Aviso 24-mar-2026

💻 Local (open-weight, on your hardware)

ModelLicenseHardwareNotes
Wan 2.7Alibabaopen-weight16-24GB VRAM (14B)Alibaba, release 22-abr-2026. Suite T2V/I2V/ref-to-video con voz + edición por instrucciones, multi-imagen
LTX-2.3Lightricksopen-weightdesde 12GB VRAM (FP8: flujos de 32GB)Lightricks, 22B DiT, audio+vídeo en una pasada; ~18x más rápido que Wan 2.2 (NO VERIF directo)
HunyuanVideoTencentopen-weight16-24GB VRAMTencent 13B, open dic-2024; sucesor HunyuanVideo-1.5 (8.3B, ~14GB VRAM, Apache 2.0) publicado 20-nov-2025. No en AA
Mochi 1Genmoopen-weightfine-tune en 1×H100/A100 80GBGenmo, 10B (AsymmDiT), oct-2024, Apache 2.0; 480p preview, alta adherencia al prompt. No en AA
SkyReels V1Skyworkopen-weightGPU dedicadaSkywork, feb-2025, primer open human-centric (fine-tune de HunyuanVideo); T2V+I2V. Ojo: SkyReels V4 (1110 AA) es otra versión

Data as of 2026-07-29 · sources: Artificial Analysis Image/Video Arena · arena.ai · llm-stats.com · Pixazo · documentación de fabricantes · arena Elo is blind human preference over the output; indicative prices — verify before deciding.